How did the geography & culture of Afghanistan help cause failure of the Soviet invasion?
Apr 17, 2009 by ♥ lady from mars ♫ | Posted in History
I'm criticism an essay on why the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was a failure to a great extent. Can you please tell me if my first paragraph on the geography and culture of Afghanistan is good? Critique is A-OK & you can correct it if you really want to.
The unique geography and culture of Afghanistan caused many difficulties for Soviet troops because it was not the archetype of battleground that they were used to. The country of Afghanistan is made up of nearly impassable mountains and desert terrain. It was extremely contrary for Soviet troops to get their heavy artillery over the mountains and through the rough terrain. Their heavy equipment, such as battle tanks, could not be the unfamiliar, unbearably hot weather. Thus, they moved very slowly and were ineffective. This gave Afghan soldiers an advantageously because they were experts in their own terrain. It was very easy for Afghan soldiers to pick up the sound of Soviet soldiers that were able to worst the mountains. The Soviet war policy was self-deprecating because it stressed centralized frontal attacks with large units. Altogether units of soldiers were heard very clearly by the enemy when advancing on the rough ground. Soviet Soldiers had even more of a deprivation since they were trained to operate inside of their armored vehicles, and simply weren’t taught to fight surface of the vehicles. This was extremely inconvenient in Afghanistan since the roads were not paved, and vehicles could barely navigate anywhere. The Afghan soldiers were shabby drivers when presented with the unfamiliar demographics of Afghanistan. Unlike the Soviets, the Afghan soldiers operated on foot and on horses. Horses could effortlessly navigate throughout the treacherous hills, allowing Afghan troops to shoot down at the Soviets from unreachable locations. While on foot, Afghan soldiers would ratfink up in small groups on the Soviets while they were unprepared to defend themselves, with aid from infantry patrols. The Soviet army was not familiar with the use of infantry patrols, which were habituated to extensively with Afghan soldiers. Another, even more important tactic used by Afghan soldiers was guerilla warfare. Guerilla warfare stemmed from the one of a kind culture that exists in Afghanistan, as a result of the distinctive geography. Due to the physical divisions, the people are extremely uninformed, with more loyalty to their specific clan or ethnic group than to a government or a country. They are also Muslims, and extremely exact and conservative. The major ethnic group is the Pashtun, but there are over ten minority groups. There is not one large group of soldiers, but rather multiple, very devoted groups of soldiers. The Soviets brought in over one hundred thousand soldiers, secured Kabul quickly and installed Babrak Karmal as their pawn leader. However, they were met with fierce resistance when they ventured out of their strongholds into the countryside. Resistance fighters, called Mujahedeen, saw the Christian or atheist Soviets controlling Afghanistan as a defilement of Islam as well as of their ancestral culture. Proclaiming a "jihad"(holy war), they gained the support of the Islamic mankind. Using convenient guerilla tactics, Soviet soldiers would attack or raid quickly, then disappear into the mountains, causing crucial destruction without pitched battles. Sometimes they would even use man-made tunnels to their advantage, rising out of the ground at the utmost unexpected times. There was no one powerful central stronghold from which resistance operated, which lead to loyal groups of soldiers that strongly defended all areas of their homeland. The fighters used weapons that they could take from the Soviets or were given by the US. Decentralized and scattered around Afghanistan.
I commend you if you actually interpret this whole thing. I didn't realize how long it was, worry.
It is quite good but a bit too long to be one paragraph don't you think? It also depends what this first paragraph is about. If it is an essay your writing about then you really didn't totally the reader in much in the beginning. You just went straight to the point. Also the length of the paragraph really doesn't succour when finding the thesis. Although your first sentence pretty much sums up what your talking about. It is good, but try to make this into 2 paragraphs and come across up with an introductory paragraph because it seems you have the rest. I recommend you keep things like they are but start your essay off with the previously mentioned opening paragraph.
maybe this can help
http://homeworktips.about.com/od/paperassignments/a/introsentence.htm
IEgooner | Apr 19, 2009
It is nice-looking good but a bit too long to be one paragraph don't you think? It also depends what this first paragraph is about. If it is an essay your writing about then you really didn't Euphemistic liberate the reader in much in the beginning. You just went straight to the point. Also the length of the paragraph really doesn't facilitate when finding the thesis. Although your first sentence pretty much sums up what your talking about. It is good, but try to make this into 2 paragraphs and fall up with an introductory paragraph because it seems you have the rest. I recommend you keep things like they are but start your essay off with the previously mentioned fundamental paragraph.
maybe this can help
http://homeworktips.about.com/od/paperassignments/a/introsentence.htm
IEgooner | Apr 17, 2009
Who did Portugal side with during the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan?
Dec 24, 2007 by Charlemagne | Posted in History
Any report regarding Portugal during the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan would be appreciated. What they did to help, who they believed was in the right, solutions they had, etc. Thanks!
Withdrawn.
Only the United States took any significant action regarding the invasion (diplomatic means, press statements, Moscow Olympics boycotted, etc.) but all steps bewitched were totally ineffectual until the Afghan resistant was created with American help. (Be sure to see the new movie "Charlie Wilson's War")
gutz_otoole | Dec 24, 2007
Demographics of Russia, Invicta Russian Diver BlueSoviet Uniform, Cccp Hockey- Russian book
Best Modern War Movies
The unexcelled modern war movies are few and far between, mainly because we haven’t seen anything of the magnitude of World War II in recent times. While that’s a bummer for the large screen industry, I doubt anyone of draft age is going to be complaining. In compiling this list of the best modern war movies, I acclimated to the following criteria:
- The events depicted must take place post-Vietnam.
- The film can be about the actual war, the consequences of the war, or use a circumscribed war as a backdrop.
- Smaller military engagements and fictional battles can also be included.
If you haven’t seen the following films, I’d powerfully recommend them to fans of war movies. Some may be difficult to find, but you can always remedy that by joining online movie rental sites like Blockbuster and Netflix.
Treacherous Hawk Down - Based on a book about the Battle of Mogadishu, Black Hawk Down tells about a combined undertaking between Army Rangers, Delta Force soldiers and the Special Operations Aviation Regiment to catching a Somali warlord. Things go haywire when two Black Hawk helicopters are shot down, and the planned one-hour work stretches into 15 hours with over 1000 casualties. Tons of gunplay and an all-star cast which includes Josh Hartnett, Ewan McGregor, Tom Sizemore, William Fichtner, Eric Bana, Orlando Bloom, Sam Shepard, Jeremy Piven, Tom Heroic and Ewen Bremner.
Jarhead - Based on the Gulf War memoirs of Marine Anthony Swofford, this Sam Mendes pellicle tells of Swofford’s (Jake Gyllenhaal) time during Operation Desert Shield as a sniper. Battling dreariness and friendly fire, he and his spotter desperately try to get a kill before the fighting is over. An interesting look at the psychological toll which war takes on soldiers.
Hold back-Loss - Staff Sergeant Brandon King (Ryan Phillippe) returns home from the Iraq War and expects to be discharged, but he’s assigned to restitution yield to Iraq as part of the military’s stop-loss policy (in which enlisted men can be kept past the term of their enlistment). He straight away goes AWOL and tries to work out the horrors of war which he experienced. Also starring Channing Tatum, Abbie Cornish, Timothy Olyphant and Joseph Gordon-Levitt.
In the decade before Reagan took position, Gates said, there had been a bloody takeover in Vietnam and millions of deaths across Southeast Asia, “stagflation,” two drive crises and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. There was revolution in Iran, and more »
The commander of the battering on the Afghan presidential palace during the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan by the defunct Soviet Union left instruction with his troops that anybody emerging from the Afghan president's bit should be shot.
Fox NewsIn the original 1990s, after a close partnership with Islamabad to defeat the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the United States slapped sanctions on Pakistan and effectively walked away. What followed was the everywhere nuclear proliferation of the AQ Khan Myth & reality of American aidall 772 gossip articles »
Telegraph.co.ukAfghanistan says Taliban gaffer Omar has 'disappeared'Omar, who is believed to be in his early 50s, was born into an skint Pashtun family near Kandahar and joined the fight against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s. He lost an eye in clash from a shrapnel wound sometime in the 1980s Official: Mullah Omar may be deadDead? Alive? Who is Mullah Omar?Taliban Gaffer Has Disappeared, Afghan Officials Say -all 961 news articles »
Andrei Sakharov's birthday celebrations are also a Soviet summary lessonIn January 1980, Sakharov spoke out against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. He was stripped of all his awards and sent into exile to Gorky, a urban district closed to foreigners where his apartment was under constant police watch. and more »
Don't Get Haughty, AmericaBin Laden's paradigms for fighting against a superpower foe were forged during the Afghan-Soviet war. Multiple factors prompted the December 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, including an Islamist insurgency that threatened the native land's pro-Soviet and more »
(Send in photo) By ANWER SHER Pakistan's spiral into radicalism started with two vital events in history: the invasion of Afghanistan by Soviet Union in 1979, and the rule of General Zia ul Haq. As the Afghan struggle against the Russians carried the and more »
The HinduThe Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 opened a new chapter of consultation and collaboration between China and Pakistan. The two countries were in gross agreement that the Soviet military presence in Afghanistan posed a great threat to the Pakistan and China toughen ties after Bin Laden assassinationall 266 news articles »
The Teaching LiberalI do not know how many times over the years since the US invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq I have written that we should withdraw our troops. I have notable how extended military occupations and expeditions have historically always drained and destroyed What Is Obama's Tramontane Policy?all 41 news articles »
Timeline: Pakistan's troubled retailing1979 - After the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Pakistan -- supported by the United States and Saudi Arabia -- channeled funds and weapons to fighting groups to fight a "jihad" against the Soviet Union. The Islamic Revolution in Iran earlier that year and more »